Is The SEC Proxy Proposal Analyst Retaliation? | Nasdaq

The intended consequences of this are stated as clarity and truthfulness of proxy recommendations.  We feel the unintended effects of this are far more serious.

First, this process of preclearing analysis and recommendations would be a clear violation of long-standing professional standards of analyst independence set nearly two decades ago.  The specific point was to address analysts’ conflicts of interest in their dealings with issuers. Not only does this new proposal subvert analyst independence, it very clearly violates the right of investors to contract for such independent advice services. We would go so far as to say it infringes on free speech.

The proxy process is the heart-beat of shareowner rights and key to a balanced corporate governance system. Honest and unfettered analyses and opinions from expert proxy analysts have become essential to this framework. We should never confuse proxy-voting analyses and recommendations that the target company doesn’t like with fraudulent or misleading facts as the issuer community would have us believe. 

via Is The SEC Proxy Proposal Analyst Retaliation? | Nasdaq

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s